JN0-664日本語版対策ガイド、JN0-664日本語問題集

さらに、It-Passports JN0-664ダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1f3gr4vuXa60ic307Xf24HnnHsF0BGLT6

IT業界での大手会社として、Juniperは認証を通して専門家の標準を確認しました。認証を取得した専門家たちの給料は普通の専門家たちに比べて高いです。だから、JN0-664試験の認証はIT業界でのあなたにとって重要です。この認証がありましたら、あなたはもっと輝かしい未来を迎えることができます。JN0-664問題集の重要性が言うまでもなく、JN0-664問題集の選択も大切です。我々の問題集を利用して、試験に合格することができます。

Juniper JN0-664試験は、キャリアを進めようとするサービスプロバイダーの専門家向けの専門レベルの認定試験です。この試験は、Junosベースのサービスプロバイダールーティングプラットフォームとネットワークの構成とトラブルシューティングにおける候補者の知識とスキルをテストするように設計されています。試験に合格すると、Juniper Networks Service Provider Networksの設計、実装、および維持に関する候補者の専門知識が検証されます。

>> JN0-664日本語版対策ガイド <<

JN0-664日本語問題集、JN0-664日本語的中対策

弊社はJN0-664問題集を買ったお客様が試験に成功することを保証いたします。もしお客様は安心できないなら、弊社は無料のJN0-664サンプルを提供いたしますから、お客様は弊社のウェブでサンプルを無料でダウンロードできて、お客様の要求にふさわしいということを確認してから、弊社のJN0-664問題集を選ぶことができます。

Juniper Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP) 認定 JN0-664 試験問題 (Q47-Q52):

質問 # 47
Exhibit

Referring to the exhibit, which two statements are correct about the dual route reflectors within a cluster?
(Choose two.)

A. RR1 advertises routes from the client to RR2. using itself as the next hop.
B. RR1 and RR2 advertise routes learned from the clients to EBGP peers, using itself as the next hop.
C. RR1 and RR2 must have the same duster ID to exchange routes learned from the client.
D. RR1 and RR2 append the duster ID when advertising routes from dient to dient.

正解：B、D

質問 # 48
Exhibit

Based on the configuration contents shown in the exhibit, which statement is true?

A. Joins for group 224.7.7.7 are accepted if the group count is less than 25
B. Joins for group 224.7.7.7 are rejected if the source address is 192.168.100.10
C. Joins for group 224.7.7.7 are always rejected, regardless of the group count.
D. Joins for any group are accepted if the group count value is less than 25.

正解：B

解説：
This configuration applies to IGMP (Internet Group Management Protocol) and is designed to control multicast group memberships on the interface ge-0/0/0.0.
Breaking Down the Configuration Policy-Statement: block-igmp
policy-statement block-igmp {
term 1 {
from {
route-filter 224.7.7.7/32 exact;
source-address-filter 192.168.100.10/32 exact;
}
then reject;
}
}
This policy blocks IGMP joins for group 224.7.7.7 only if the source IP is 192.168.100.10.
If both conditions match, the request is rejected.
IGMP Configuration on Interface ge-0/0/0.0
[edit protocols igmp]
user@router# show
interface ge-0/0/0.0 {
group-policy block-igmp;
group-limit 25;
}
group-policy block-igmp applies the policy statement block-igmp, meaning IGMP join requests are evaluated based on this policy.
group-limit 25 means the interface allows up to 25 multicast groups.
Evaluating the Answer Choices
✅ A. Joins for group 224.7.7.7 are rejected if the source address is 192.168.100.10.
Correct, because:
The policy specifically matches group 224.7.7.7 and source IP 192.168.100.10.
If both conditions are met, the join is rejected.
❌ B. Joins for any group are accepted if the group count value is less than 25.
Incorrect, because:
The group-limit (25) applies to the total number of IGMP groups but does not override explicit policy rules.
Even if there are fewer than 25 groups, a join request can still be rejected by the policy statement.
❌ C. Joins for group 224.7.7.7 are always rejected, regardless of the group count.
Incorrect, because:
The policy only blocks joins from the specific source 192.168.100.10.
Joins from other sources to 224.7.7.7 are allowed.
❌ D. Joins for group 224.7.7.7 are accepted if the group count is less than 25.
Incorrect, because:
Joins for 224.7.7.7 from source 192.168.100.10 will always be rejected, even if the group count is below 25.
The group-limit does not override the rejection policy.
"Joins for group 224.7.7.7 are rejected if the source address is 192.168.100.10." Official Juniper Documentation Reference:
Junos IGMP Policy Configuration Guide
"A group-policy statement allows filtering IGMP joins based on multicast group address and source IP."

質問 # 49
Referring to the exhibit, CE-1 is providing NAT services for the hosts at Site 1 and you must provide Internet access for those hosts.
Which two statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose two.)

A. You must configure a static route in the main routing instance for the 10.1.2.0/24 prefix that uses the VPN-A.inet.0 table as the next hop.
B. You must configure a static route in the main routing instance for the 203.0.113.1/32 prefix that uses the VPN-A.inet.0 table as the next hop.
C. You must configure a RIB group on PE-1 to leak a default route from the inet.0 table to the VPN-A.inet.0 table.
D. You must configure a RIB group on PE-1 to leak the 10.1.2.0/24 prefix from the VPN-A.inet.0 table to the inet.0 table.

正解：B、C

解説：
We want a static route to the public IP. The private IP is hidden behind the NATed public IP, so a static route to the private range is useless to us.

質問 # 50
Exhibit

Which two statements about the output shown in the exhibit are correct? (Choose two.)

A. The PE router has the capability to pop flow labels
B. There has been a VLAN ID mismatch.
C. The connection has not flapped since it was initiated.
D. The PE is attached to a single local site.

正解：A、D

解説：
Explanation
According to 1 and 2, BGP Layer 2 VPNs use BGP to distribute endpoint provisioning information and set up pseudowires between PE devices. BGP uses the Layer 2 VPN (L2VPN) Routing Information Base (RIB) to store endpoint provisioning information, which is updated each time any Layer 2 virtual forwarding instance (VFI) is configured. The prefix and path information is stored in the L2VPN database, which allows BGP to make decisions about the best path.
In the output shown in the exhibit, we can see some information about the L2VPN RIB and the pseudowire state. Based on this information, we can infer the following statements:
* The PE is attached to a single local site. This is correct because the output shows only one local site ID (1) under the L2VPN RIB section. A local site ID is a unique identifier for a site within a VPLS domain.
If there were multiple local sites attached to the PE, we would see multiple local site IDs with different prefixes.
* The connection has not flapped since it was initiated. This is correct because the output shows that the uptime of the pseudowire is equal to its total uptime (1w6d). This means that the pseudowire has been up for one week and six days without any interruption or flap.
* There has been a VLAN ID mismatch. This is not correct because the output shows that the remote and local VLAN IDs are both 0 under the pseudowire state section. A VLAN ID mismatch occurs when the remote and local VLAN IDs are different, which can cause traffic loss or misdelivery. If there was a VLAN ID mismatch, we would see different values for the remote and local VLAN IDs.
* The PE router has the capability to pop flow labels. This is correct because the output shows that the flow label pop bit is set under the pseudowire state section. The flow label pop bit indicates that the PE router can pop (remove) the MPLS flow label from the packet before forwarding it to the CE device.
The flow label is an optional MPLS label that can be used for load balancing or traffic engineering purposes.

質問 # 51
You are configuring schedulers to define the class-of-service properties of output queues. You want to control packet drops during periods of congestion.
In this scenario, which CoS configuration parameter would be used to accomplish this task?

A. buffer size
B. drop profile
C. shaping rate
D. priority

正解：B

質問 # 52
......

あなたは彼と同じような仕事の能力を持っていると思うかもしれませんし、あなたも一生懸命働いているので、誰かが突然昇進していることに気付きましたか？（JN0-664信頼できる試験ダンプ）有効なJuniper認定が鍵になるかもしれません。あなたの会社がこの大企業のプロジェクトに応募する場合、有用な認定はプロジェクトマネージャーの地位にとって大きな利点になります。 JN0-664信頼できる試験ダンプは、試験に合格し、貴重な変更を取得するのに役立ちます。 heしないでください。時は金なり。当社のJN0-664信頼できる試験ダンプは、近年、数千人の受験者が試験をクリアするのに役立ちました。

JN0-664日本語問題集: https://www.it-passports.com/JN0-664.html

Juniper JN0-664日本語版対策ガイド行き届いたアフターサービス、我々のJN0-664日本語問題集 - Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP)試験問題集は過去の試験データによって、すべてのエラーの問題が完全に削除し、改善します、TopExamの提供する合格率の高いJN0-664認定資格資料と行き届いたサービスで、広く好評を博しました、Juniper JN0-664日本語版対策ガイド私たちに知られているように、意志があるところには方法があります、Juniper JN0-664日本語版対策ガイドそれらを素早く簡単に習得できます、JN0-664の学習教材が試験に合格するための手助けになることを本当に願っています、数万人の顧客は私たちのJN0-664問題集を利用したら、JN0-664試験に合格しました。

神戸に行ったとき、車の中で少し兄姉の話を聞いたぐらいで、どんな家族と、どんなふうに過ごしてきたのJN0-664か、おれは何も知らない、形を保ち、鼓動を打ち続けたのだ、行き届いたアフターサービス、我々のService Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP)試験問題集は過去の試験データによって、すべてのエラーの問題が完全に削除し、改善します。

JN0-664｜ハイパスレートのJN0-664日本語版対策ガイド試験｜試験の準備方法Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP)日本語問題集 Juniper Service Provider, Professional (JNCIP-SP)

TopExamの提供する合格率の高いJN0-664認定資格資料と行き届いたサービスで、広く好評を博しました、私たちに知られているように、意志があるところには方法があります、それらを素早く簡単に習得できます。

さらに、It-Passports JN0-664ダンプの一部が現在無料で提供されています：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1f3gr4vuXa60ic307Xf24HnnHsF0BGLT6